Ben Lesh
Ben Lesh
> The signal can already be aborted, in which case the abort event will never fire again. Yeah, this is one of the things that `addTeardown` is working around. In...
That's very true. I personally don't care if it's `on` or some other name. `button.events('click')`, `button.when('click')`, `button.observe('click')` or some such thing. @ming-codes: I'm not sure what you mean by `Observable.from`,...
> Although the only hard namespace conflict is Prototype.js FWIW: This shouldn't break Prototype.js apps. Prototype will conflict with and overwrite it, but it won't break. They're [creating a new...
If we're doing all of this research on the name `on`, do we have alternative names that we could check at the same time?
The analog in RxJS (because promises) is actually `firstValueFrom` and `lastValueFrom`, which do support default values. As if they're empty they should reject, and that's not always desirable. IMO, I...
Add the step to check subscriber's active state to next(value)/error(error)/complete() as a shortcut
I'm not quite sure how the build is failing, maybe @domfarolino needs to look at it, or maybe it just needs rebased... however, it seems that @tetsuharuohzeki [you'll need to...
Add the step to check subscriber's active state to next(value)/error(error)/complete() as a shortcut
@domfarolino oops, fixed.
Add the step to check subscriber's active state to next(value)/error(error)/complete() as a shortcut
The additions in this PR look correct to me. It sounds like we're also discussing some related, but not exactly related, issue of converting a partial observer or next handler...
I think the smaller set of methods is the real key. I've seen so much RxJS over the years that was bad because people felt they needed to use the...
Completely unrelated to this issue, but related to your comment about AbortSignal and fetch... `fetch` has its own issues WRT cancellation. The way it's wired in there doesn't compose well....