Ben Lesh
Ben Lesh
From another discussion: There's a question about whether or not we should have a way to read a value if it's a signal or a value... or make sure it's...
We could test to see if it's more than 2147483647, and if so, schedule an interval... basically something like this: ```ts if (ms > 2147483647) { const MAX = 2147483647;...
This looks like it's happening because we're examining the array given prior to subscription, we're not assuming that someone might mutate the array after that. The workaround for now would...
I agree. I would also like to add it to forEach, but that needs to be more carefully considered, I think.
I'll have a go at this soon.
Honestly, I remember glancing at it, and thinking about it, but deciding (at the time) that it doesn't seem like something we want to support. If people want to turn...
So the desired solution would look like this? ```ts rxTest.run(({ cold, expectObservable }) => { const a = cold(' (aaaaa) '); const b = cold(' (bbbbb) '); const c =...
After discussion about #5760, core team decided to punt on certain TestScheduler ergonomics issues until next major.
I guess the important bit that @cartant is bringing up is the use cases this fulfills. One of the issues we _already have_ with this library is we have a...
(cries internally)