Paul Harper comments

Results 14 comments of


                                            Paul Harper

Display the maker progress (output) to the user.

Wouldn't `:Neomake! | copen` and `:Neomake | lopen` work?

SplitDateTimeWidget, etc fields aren't tracked in state (form.data)?

I'm not using the `SplitDateTimeField`; rather I'm making my own `MultiValueField` subclass. I'm having the same issues though; even though `decompress` is called in the widget, it is never included...

TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not callable

I was able to fix this by doing: ```bash pip install --upgrade setuptools ``` It upgraded me from `47.1.0` to `57.0.0`.

Ability to ignore certain productions

Agreed. Is there a clean way to do this at the moment?

for own key in { ... }

or ``` for key ownedby obj { ... } ``` Edit: sorry, accidentally closed the issue.

for own key in { ... }

hmmm... I feel like I'm a little bit stuck on own. I think it's an intuitive word because it is in the native JavaScript method hasOwnProperty. What about: ``` forown...

for own key in { ... }

Fair enough, lol. Well, I will try to put something together to make this work tonight. I'll pick a keyword for you to veto :) Edit: just saw your comment...

for own key in { ... }

I really like `for x from y {...}`. That one feels good to me. About the ranges, what if a range simply resolved to an array? ``` [1...5] // compiles...

for own key in { ... }

I like it (I will infer the rest of that function :). Should we distinguish between inclusive and exclusive ranges? ``` [1..5] // => [2, 3, 4] or [1, 2,...

"foo['batz']! someArgs" results in Error

The code ``` method = :get server[method]! route doStuff() ``` generates an error. I would expect it to do this: ``` javascript method = 'get' server[method](route, function() { doStuff() })...