Arnaud beck
Arnaud beck
I confirm the issue is still the same on 10.0.2.
Hi Stuart You are correct on both points. I have tried a few tests with the corrections you propose and saw very little difference in the results. The most important...
Hi @Status-Mirror Thanks for this massive report. I'll try to address the different points progressively as I find time to read through them all. About point 2, I think you...
Let's move to point 3, boundary condition of $\tilde{B_r}^m$ on axis for $m> 1$. First of all, note that the $\tilde{B}^m$ fields are functions of $x$ and $r$ and not...
For the point 4.1 you are correct, the minus sign must be replaced by a plus. Congrats for spotting this one out !
Yes I'm not done yet. Unfortunately this takes time and I haven't had time to prepare a proper answer to the interesting points raised here.
@Status-Mirror About point 4.2: missing currents in the Buneman boundary conditions. First please note that the boundary conditions on particles are applied before current deposition. Therefore a particle crossing r=rmax...
@Status-Mirror About point 4.3: you are correct the `-1` here is kind of arbitrary and not really justified. The question of boundary conditions in the corners is a very difficult...
@Status-Mirror About 5.1 you are absolutely correct. I've run some basic tests and this correction has some impact on the Bl component of the reflected laser on the xmax boundary....
Somme additional comments have been addressed but I haven't had time to answer here yet. Let's keep it open.