Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
When ideas like this have come up, I've wondered: how would this idea of "add-ons" or "extensions" actually work? Do we have any idea? >
What kind of differences are there across jurisdictions? Minor or major? What do they look like? >
> > Allowing this on a user-specified per-citation basis seems much more complex. > > I expect that. But I think, that’s the only way to really solve it. I...
> > So perhaps there would be a distinction between citation class (in-text), type (author-date), and variant (narrative)? > > And for this case, you'd have citation elements to define...
If that's the case, I misunderstood the request. I was assuming wanting to mix footcite and citet in the same document. So then we can close this issue; no?
> The current `@narrative` structure does this with no changes needed to styles. Unless, like APA, author is formatted differently when intext. Multiple citation elements would require changes for all...
To me, my main concern now is we don't add `cs:intext` and then later find we need/want a more general solution.
No; I'm not saying don't add `cs:intext` now. I'm saying I don't want to add it now, and then for some future release realize we should have adopted a more...
> @bdarcus do you have an idea how such a general solution could look like? Not specifically, but generally it would be a more general element name, and the variant...
Not sure this is that simple. Does this mean we need to also add "place" to names support, and deprecate "publisher-place"? --- ``` Original Comment By: Bruce D'Arcus ```