Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
Maybe this is an example of a request we reject? If people need this functionality, they should use biblatex.
This latest suggestion, to be clear, involves no new attributes, but simply a couple of attribute values; correct? Obviously this would be a good path forward, if we did support...
If anyone feels strongly about it, put it back in discussion? >
So you're wanting to change a mostly flat (aside from contributors and dates) data model to a more structured one.
Yeah, it's easy to add these variable strings ("reviewed-ttile" and such), so let's just do that. We could have defined "container" as an object, for example, but we didn't.
> For the data schema, an option might be to split out the schemas into separate files that match the RNC type and variable structure and use a build script...
> So, what shall we do about this now? Should I draft a PR for `original-`, `reviewed-`, and `-short`? Or should we go the automated route instead? Depends who's going...
I don't understand. I was assuming input is the rnc file(s), output is csl-data.json. What were you thinking? A single, say python, file, whose contents is the data representation, output...
IC. I'm agnostic; whatever gets us to the best and easiest result, which is consistent schemas, and clean git histories, including diffs. I'm not sure on the details of CI...
> I’m sorry, but that’s not the reality. EU statutes are an integral part of every EU member’s legislation. Thus, citing Austrian law may mean citing EU statutes. EU law...