Benoît Bouré

@andrejunges it really depends on your use case. can you elaborate?

@andrejunges What you probably want is Schema federation This is currently not supported by AppSync, but there is a request for it: https://github.com/aws/aws-appsync-community/issues/35 However someone suggested using this: https://github.com/0xR/graphql-transform-federation I...

@SoimanAndrei Please see this thread: https://github.com/sid88in/serverless-appsync-plugin/issues/300 I gave some clues on how this *might* be achieved. I have not tried it though.

@SET001 I don't think AppSYnc supports that. In any case, I believe this question should be asked to AWS, not here. What is your use case?

Hi @njeirath The `apiId` field is meant to deploy move an existing API to serverless. It will completely replace all resources of the existing API with those defined in the...

> I can definitely try duplicating the schema however I don't think it'll be a sustainable solution for us long term since keeping the schemas synchronized will become problematic. Yes,...

> I don't know if there is a point to have a service without a schema, the resolvers and data sources have to be connected to something, and that something...

Sorry, I missed this. A setting would be great, indeed. Thank you for your suggestion. As a workaround, here is how we've used it in some projects: ```yaml caching: ${file(templates/macros.js):getAppSyncCachingConfig}...

@jmvalino [it is](https://github.com/sid88in/serverless-appsync-plugin/blob/v2/src/resources/Api.ts#L335) I think it's just [not documented](https://github.com/sid88in/serverless-appsync-plugin/blob/v2/doc/caching.md) (yet). Thanks for raising this.

@hofline not sure if this is a copy/paste issue, but it looks like that there is an indentation issue here: ````yml substitutions: APISTAGE: ${opt:stage} ```` Also, substitution is case sensitive:...