Bozhidar Batsov

> And so while tools.nrepl *could* be involved Btw, it's just nREPL (`nrepl.`) now. The `tools.` part was dropped when we decided to leave Clojure Contrib. Normally we refer to...

> Given that, what would you like this first version to look like? Would it resolve most of the questions if I were to change the auth implementation to be...

Yeah, your suggestion makes sense to me. I'm assuming you plan to make the auth-middlewares run before every other middleware, right? Btw, it might be good to use `authentication` instead...

Well, seems to me that'd be better - especially given the fact that i called it `authentication` and you called it `authorization`. :D I just assumed that we'd consider the...

I think blanket authorization will be fine, so let's not overthink this. After all any form of authorization is going to be infinitely better than none. :-) In an ideal...

> Sounds good. I wondered about keeping the shorter :auth for the key since it'll be in every message, but probably not significant either way. I'm fine with whatever you...

That seems reasonable to me.

> How is the existing --handler argument typically used from the command line, i.e. what's an sample argument value? (Does it rely on reader evaluation?) It's a string referring to...

Or `.nrepl/config.edn`. Don't have a strong preference for this. It should definitely be possible to instruct the server to look for whatever config file we opt to use by default...

> Of course, one potential advantage to a config subdir like .config/nrepl/, .nrepl/, or whatever is that you can easily put single values in separate files, which means that it's...