batracos
batracos
I never really checked the package as I load the code from the repo but I agree that it's bad if the `build` folder is copied there. I am not...
Sorry for the long time off the project. I simply did not have the bandwidth to spare. Except for those three tests not passing this seems good to go.
True. It seems that both`Factorial` and `Factorial2` have higher precedence than `Not`. ``` In[1154]:= Hold[a!a]//FullForm Hold[a!!a]//FullForm Out[1154]//FullForm= Hold[Times[Factorial[a],a]] Out[1155]//FullForm= Hold[Times[Factorial2[a],a]] ```
1. All the symbols now in `built_in_numeric_constants` are `NumericQ`. Neither `Infinity` nor `Indeterminate` satisfy that. I see your point though. What do the other people think? 2. `MachinePrecision` is a...
Let's move `Infinity` and `Indeterminate` then.
In which way would you update that? I can only think of a negative look-behind on defined symbols would be terribly expensive. ``[\b$`]`` would just move the backtick or the...
I did not touch this because good patterns (that I was able to find) bring bad performance and vice versa.
This is exactly what I am using locally. I never committed that because I am not super sure about it but given that we are already in two people coming...
Yeah sorry. I have been meaning to create a PR for that for some time. I'll do it today.