Bas Zalmstra
Bas Zalmstra
THis would require a version bump of the paths.json right? Because only then can we assume that the absense of the executable permissions field means its not executable.
@wolfv Can you check if this is also faster on your machine?
The other reason is that you can quickly statically verify if a given set of input specs still match the packages stored in the lock-file without accessing the internet. And...
Its for this design goal: https://github.com/conda/rattler/blob/407df40f617a94bd667ff1cf1aef6d442a88e80e/crates/rattler_lock/src/lib.rs#L38C8-L38C36 That is also the reason we have to store the entire package record (including some fields that are almost never used like the `size`),...
@gzm55 you mean a file per environment?
Its still in the ideation phase. Im struggling with how to standardize some extra features that pixi needs but which arent necessarily conda compatible, like source dependencies. Maybe Ill find...
@warnerwarner Would you be able to provide us with more information?
You can also have the situation where two source definitions would otherwise overwrite the content of the other. That might not be desired behavior.
> Or we change the way we do activation completely (to work like pixi) and add everything to the Jinja context :) To me, from a user perspective, this makes...
@prsabahrami would you be able to check this PR and see if this is something you think we should do either here or in rattler?