Witold Baryluk

I will grab this. ATM there are only two auth providers. The configuration is simple, but requires right now digging into code to know the format of configuration for them....

I can pick this up and address the remaining issues. I agree, it should use `.get()` so it works with existing config. I also would like an option to ignore...

Same problem here. The packer configs use very old Ubuntu too, 16:04, and most of the python scripts use `#!/usr/bin/env python` instead of `#!/usr/bin/env python3`, which causes a lot of...

I have a bunch of enhancements to documentation and `Dockerfile` and packer setup, that should resolve this. This also updates to python3 , newer ubuntu, and improves the entrypoint mechanism....

I would chime in. While we do not use oncall, I think it would make sense to run them together, as this simplifies deployment massively. Also right now some scripts,...

I wish there was a deep copy available, as well merging (i.e. message `a` into `b`, with fields in `b` that already already set but overwritten by values from `a`,...

FYI. I implemented a deep copy (including merging into existing message) using descriptors. it ended pretty complex, about 400 lines of code (including debugging). I believe I handled almost everything,...

I extended the code to cover more cases, including handling merge & non-merge intent, as well some support for optional, at least on the simple values. I still need to...

After writing some more tests, I identified a number of bugs and issues in the current code posted above. But I got local copies that do fix most of it,...

@PetteriAimonen Yeah, I noticed the fuzz test in nanopb, but I didn't take a look into it yet. It would be nice to also hook it up, but more for...