Baptiste Daroussin

I have no opinion there, but people seems to want the long option documented so I don't know

Sorry it takes time on this one, I haven't have been able to fully review yet, maybe @vstakhov you have an opinion on this one?

pkg uses libfetch, can you try manually fetching via `fetch(1)` one of those packages?

it is expected the extension is always .pkg, for the compression format is tar.xz

you are right

this is still strange because even if the version is not taken in account, the digest used to decide if something is a candidate includes the required_shlibs, to protobuf requirement...

probably the right thing here is then to make provide to poudriere the digest compute pkg uses, pkg query -F mypkg "%X" should print it

Answer 'n' to all the question should be the workaround (don't worry it should be safe) When we cannot rename because we already have a package with the same name...

Well I see where it can be confusing, but the goal of the "[repository]" is to be explicit where the packages will be pulled from. during pkg delete their are...

I do like what I see, thanks a lot, would it be possible to add tests in the test suite ?