Piotr Banski

Results 30 comments of Piotr Banski

Thank you. Would you be able to suggest a free and open source to get those entries from?

Yes, you're not a lawyer, but you can look up the publication date of the dictionary and form a reasonable assumption on (a.o) that basis :-)

Replying to specific points: > BTW, if the schemas were in tools/, we wouldn't need to copy / symlink the schemas to each dictionary, but they were part of the...

Trying to keep the off-topic to a single ticket, so I am reposting Sebastian's comment from elsewhere. I am not sure if Sebastian had read my reply above before posting...

Actually, it's not that simple. I've only been an end-user of test-driven development and have only a rough idea of how it could be implemented in practice. I would probably...

Overall admission: I shouldn't have given this ticket the label "enhancement". I was looking for something like "discussion" and went for the more or less closest thing. Gonna remove that...

That's what the ticket is for :-) Posted it because I know I won't be able to act on this immediately. But if your question meant that you want to...

Oooooops. I have only now seen red lights flashing: what exactly is the expected behaviour here, please? What is not sufficient so that the schema should be modified? I only...

Hi again. I've looked at the ODD (gosh, it _does_ need a refresh), and there is no reference to a forced `` or anything like that. So let us please...

Ah, OK, Karl edited the schema [directly](https://github.com/freedict/fd-dictionaries/commit/f3e2a21cb080dc0a2982b9ba646cd665601b2d6d#diff-430440a4263013232f94a7f725bb2f51). OK, so it's really good that this topic came up. Karl: I don't know about the extra message. ODD is a standard part...