Jens Balvig

Ah, the intent isn't really to have an entirely unique identifier or add significance to the branch name, it's mainly a way to: - remove time spent thinking of branch...

@masciugo good question! I'm actually not sure I can think of a good reason to exclude `destroy` 😅. Most likely we simply didn't need it [at the time](https://github.com/balvig/spyke/commit/a9c98c1a4f8e8014f00921f4b8bcd3df8f202fc6)? 🤔

Hey @thedarkside, thanks for your thoughts! I've actually been having similar ideas. 😅 I started fiddling around with something in https://github.com/balvig/spyke/pull/137/files a while ago that I never quite got to...

I ran into this issue myself today, so just came here to say thanks in advance 😅 and let me know if I can help with anything to move things...

Cheers, good shout @rafaelfranca! The only thing that immediately comes to mind is [having the custom exception inherit from `ECONNREFUSED` rather than `ConnectionError`](https://github.com/rails/activeresource/pull/396/commits/e8b9e1cb93d721aa65274d85ceebd0468497621b). The lack of parity with the other...

Thank you @barrerajl! Is this the case just for relations or for f.ex `User.find do ... end` as well? If you're happy to set up some tests/fix for this, that...

Hello @djpate, great question! Out of the box, Spyke makes no assumptions about what to do with different status codes and only cares about the content of the hash passed...

Good shout @pboling! [Her itself touches on some of the reasons](https://github.com/remi/her?tab=readme-ov-file#history). While ActiveResource was removed from Rails, updates do seem to trickle in with a bit more regularity than when...

For what it's worth, I've run into this as well! 🙇 While it's fantastic that the generator creates validation logic from the schema, it was surprising that it happens when...

> what about adding an option to skip validation in the constructor? @wing328 thanks for that idea! Although that might solve the problem to some extent, I worry it could...