Jens Balvig
Jens Balvig
> It makes the 1,2 only when it is the primary key. If not it uses the id[].. notation. This is not consistent. Ah, to clarify, it's not really about...
Great to see this! Has been bugging me as well :) For me the `belongs_to` classes still seem to slip through in nested associations even when using this fix...ie ```...
@aauthor, @dturnerTS Sorry about that, while writing the failing spec I actually realised the problem _was_ in fact that `Step` _doesn't_ define a `belongs_to` relationship...I somehow added that while formatting...
I know it's not particularly helpful to just add another +1 here 😅 🙇 , but if it helps gauge demand, we've run into this problem as well. Essentially we're...
@kennyadsl I randomly came by here with the same question. 😅 I think the solution might be using [Trusted Publishers](https://guides.rubygems.org/trusted-publishing/adding-a-publisher/) along with the [official RubyGems GitHub action](https://github.com/rubygems/release-gem).
That looks correct! Do you have jQuery loaded? If you clone this project you will find that it basically contains a working app that the spec suite uses and which...
Hey there @lazlyhu! And sorry for the super late reply, finally coming up for air after weeks of GDPR :) Just to clarify, the current behavior is that `cp8 start`...
Sounds like a good idea 👍
Does that automatically create a token on behalf of the user I wonder?
Cool, sounds like a nice enhancement.