balacij
balacij
I should also mention that the above code is just a prototype, I think we can refine it a bit more. In particular, I think we should be using `newtype`s...
> I think the technical ideas on the database side are sound. I'm going to want to work on the names of the functions provided by this, but that's not...
> We really don't want to do reflection in Haskell. A lot of this stuff in Java is really meta-linguistic (i.e. outside the actual language). I want to stay within...
I _think_ this ticket is also loosely relevant to #2195, specifically in understanding the role of `SystemInformation`.
> I don't necessarily want to put databases inside databases, but I think that creating a "current database for this example" from a collection of other databases, that's definitely a...
I've just now realized that I completely neglected to mention _why_ I looked into this. I've been looking into this because I need to be able to place arbitrarily parameterized...
> The thing that I am most curious about is how this will change (or enable change) in user code, as well as in data-drasil. My feeling is that if...
Ah, ok. Thank you. Would we then have 1 large `[Chunk]` from which we use to insert all the chunks, or would we have 1 area of code that just...
Do you have a design in mind for the functions? If so, would it be easiest to do this in my first pass at this ticket? As of right now,...
Thank you. In that case, I will come back to it after a first pass. Aside: While working on this, I realized that `ChunkDB -> ChunkDB` transformers/printers sound interesting. We...