balacij

> If UID turns into a newtype, would that require the user to give an input of UID "actualUID" instead of just their "actualUID"? Yep, though, it would probably best...

@JacquesCarette I like those names better, I agree. `+++` sounds especially good. @Ant13731 Does it still cause a name clash in the `Language.Drasil.Development` module? If not, can we use qualified...

Hmm, I'd say it should be a `String`, representing a suffix however, that's appended to the UID of the `QuantityDict` given to it. Regarding the other constructors, I imagine that...

I had a personal note to create a ticket to continue the new UID system. However, seeing as we still have this ticket open where the majority of the discussion...

Thank you, @smiths! :smile: Hopefully so, I think some of the "shallow analysis" could also go into the main `package.yaml` files and the README.md files too.

Thank you, that sounds like a great idea!

Re: `drasil-database`: > In other words, I don't think we're even close to ready to do something sensible with it. Sounds good, I can see why. Hopefully it will become...

> An excellent question indeed! What you are witnessing here is a very long evolution, much of it in parallel, of various pieces. And you have keenly observed is that...

> On `drasil-database` and `SystemInformation`: the fundamental problem here is that we don't have a good explanation of what these ought to be. And certainly they were created before our...

> There's a whole lot more content in this issue, but I think the spun-off issues, and the comments above, already are a lot of work. So when that flurry...