Arthit Suriyawongkul

I think that line ("All the SupplyChain will need a Licenses. What would be the License for a TransportAction?") is a question, a devil's advocate, a counter example. That if...

As this PR is keep developing through the discussion. Please see the latest proposed text in the "Files changed" tab https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/pull/1122/files -- To have a smaller and agreeable portion moving...

`AnonymizationMethod` can be a class similar to [`IntegrityMethod`](https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/develop/model/Core/Classes/IntegrityMethod.md) and we could have enums developed like ones in https://github.com/spdx/crypto-algorithms/

From 2025-11-19 AI Team Meeting, we agreed that we will make these properties as optional: - releaseTime - suppliedBy - downloadLocation - packageVersion and keep this property as mandatory: -...

For scoping, I believe you can use LifecycleScopedRelationship - with scope = test - with relationshipType = dependsOn https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.1/model/Core/Classes/LifecycleScopedRelationship/

@ccl-core in case you have a maintainer right to re-run the test, you can try that as well. I think it should work since we already have #863 merged into...

@ccl-core You're right. It could work with other PRs but not this one.

From 23 July 2025 AI Team Call, - /Core/PresenceType is for data field presence/absence and not for human presence/absence. - Need an enumeration for autonomy - We can add `autonomyLevel`...

Fixed and already live on https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/

Can there be a scenario like this? -- An SBOM author may try to open as much as possible about dependencies but at the same time have to honoured contracts...