Clemens Backes
Clemens Backes
This is old, but still useful I think. Can someone with the respective access please merge this?
Thanks for bringing this up. The main motivation for adding the `WebAssembly.Function` constructor is to avoid the overhead of creating a module and an instance just for wrapping a host...
> Well, it has the prototype and properties of a regular function, i.e., is a subclass. If WebIDL has no way to describe that then we have to invent our...
Ah, I didn't know that it's possible in JS to subclass `Function`. In that case I agree that this is what we want. Weird that this is not expressible in...
@Ms2ger can you clarify what exactly the problem with the original snippet is? Is it that `global.Function` does not exist in WebIDL?
Thanks for the pull request. Interesting, how easy this seems to be :) Your solution seems to be a bit of an overkill though. The current implementation already creates an...
Don't we need an opt-out mechanism to be able to land tests that node/V8 doesn't currently pass?
Yeah, I see that it's quite some work, but I think long-term we really need to be able to skip individual tests. Otherwise we always have the risk of introducing...
> > V8 supports an unofficial / never specified `compilation hints` custom section. > > How to emit that section and what is its format? The "compilation hints" were in...
Thanks, Ben, for compiling this surprisingly large list of problems. I agree to everything, so feel free to go ahead and propose the actual change. About the "table initialization" line:...