Ayush Patnaik

> So best to integrate the contents of Lowess.jl into Loess.jl? I'll do a PR to add Lowess to Loess. It seems appropriate. We can discuss further over there.

> @ayushpatnaikgit Is this a package you plan to manage? I am happy to get it merged if so, since it is unlikely that we can get the review done...

I am getting a different error: ``` ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package Plots [91a5bcdd]: ```

> I've a branch which fixes the conflict with master but I can't push the changes to your branch. Can you give me the necessary permissions? See https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork. Otherwise you...

Hi @joshday can you please describe how you were planning to implement this? Perhaps someone at [xKDR](https://github.com/xKDR) can pick it up. We need it for the [Survey](https://github.com/xKDR/Survey.jl/issues/306) package.

Here you go: 1) `boundary=:touches` vs `all_touched, True` ```julia py""" import rasterio # pip install rasterio import numpy as np from rasterio.mask import mask import geopandas as gpd def pyzonal(shapefilepath,...

> Perhaps I can change the start and end points to Int just for testing. Can you tell me which line to change [here](https://github.com/rafaqz/Rasters.jl/blob/main/src/polygon_ops.jl#L231-L299)? Or perhaps create a separate branch...

Do you know to do zonal statistics in ArchGDAL? Perhaps we can first compare ArchGDAL vs Rasterio.

Since there was a [bug fix](https://github.com/rafaqz/Rasters.jl/issues/326), I have computed the results again for `boundary=:touches` vs `all_touched, True` ``` 36×2 DataFrame Row │ julia_result python_result │ Int64 Int64 ─────┼───────────────────────────── 1 │...

The answers are close, but Rasters' results are consistently lower than rasterio's.