Andrew V. Teylu

I took a lightening-speed look at this, so my apologies if I've overlooked something: - [TTMath](https://www.ttmath.org) -- BSD, compile-time width ❌ - [libtommath](https://github.com/libtom/libtommath) -- public domain, run-time width ✅ -...

Okay, so: 1. I emailed Steffan to ask for his interpretation of "additionally be used" (my personal interpretation is that he is saying that the C portions can be licensed...

Reply from Steffan: > Dear Andrew: > > The C library at the core of this Perl module can additionally be used, > modified and redistributed under the terms of...

Follow-up: I replied to Steffen checking that he wants the code under Artistic 1.0 and not 2.0. If there's a chance he wants it under 2.0, then the statement about...

Reply from Steffen: > Dear Andrew, > > I wasn't aware of the Artistic License 2.0, because I have stopped coding > many years ago. > > I really don't...

Yep; I think that's actually quite good. - Source distributions need to maintain the notice about including AL 2.0 components, and that's addressed with what you wrote - Binary distributions...

Okay, I can take a look at this. @msoos what are your thoughts here? You had a quite a strong opinion in 2018, so I'd be interested to know if...

@msoos do you have some thoughts on areas that "need some love"? I guess what you're saying is that `clang` is giving "superficial" (i.e., genuine, but quite shallow) issues, whereas...

Do you have any examples of 'fix' rather than 'improve'?

I think my point here is: - fixing == changing the code for the better without modifying the functionality of the core tool - improving == changing the code to...