Ayende Rahien

Yes, I'll fix that.

@maciejaszyk the query you send _will work_. The reason we need `0` there is that this makes no sense: `.Where( x.Name.CompareTo(name) > 32)`

Yes, we support all comparison types.

That should probably be fixed, should be fairly easy

Pushed a big change now. The tests for dynamic fields aren't passing, but all the others are on my end

We need to think about how we can handle sorting on dynamic fields. But first, I think we need to wire dynamic fields from RavenDB and see how that works.

This is not done yet, but I would like a review on the approach anyway at this time.

Some design notes that we need to consider. Here is what the sharding configuration now looks: ``` { "DatabaseName": "CanShardByDocumentsPrefix_1", "DatabaseState": "Normal", "Topology": null, "Sharding": { "Shards": [ { "Members":...

That was actually a change that was made because we have to track the missing values, otherwise `Load(foo)` will return null (after a request) and then `Load(foo)` will do the...

You can also check `IsDeleted`, which will be true for this scenario