Emanuele Francioni

Before being able to work on this, specs need to be finalized

This is something for archival nodes to offer. Not strictly needed for Mainnet nor part of the protocol

Closed in favor of #1853

Closed since we don't really have a problem here anymore after solving #1435 and #1636

TBC, this is just about collecting ratification votes from previous iteration, not voting

Sorry to be that guy, but can we correct the typo? It is "consensus" not "concensus"

On a second thought, the impact of a dynamic `reserved` field is minimal if considering that it might be abused for other uses anyway.