C. Augusto Proiete

@fandrei Any news on this one?

@fandrei Do you want to put together a reproducible example that we can test? Or should we close this one for the time being?

@bacar it's been a few months since you opened this issue. Did you get to the bottom of it? If not, do you have a reproducible example for this?

Sounds good! I didn't try to reproduce. We're discussing adding SourceLink and publish `snupkg` packages for debugging (which will require portable PDBs), and I thought I'd ask you if maybe...

I was able to reproduce it. [Attached](https://github.com/Excel-DNA/ExcelDna/files/4888177/Repro291PortablePdb.zip) is a sample project that demonstrates it. #### Excel-DNA Add-In (net472) with regular pdb (i.e. `pdbonly`)  --- #### Excel-DNA Add-In (net472) with...

@iainb123 Would you be able to put together an example project that reproduces this issue, as well as screenshots of actual vs expected appearance of controls?

I was able to reproduce this with an Excel add-in and can see that [Visual Styles](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/controls/cookbook-overview) are **not** enabled. Windows MessageBox on a regular .NET app (Visual Styles enabled by...

@govert I'm thinking there's a couple of things we might want to consider: 1. Modify our build task to honor the value that the user sets in [`ExcelDnaAddInForDebugging`](https://github.com/Excel-DNA/ExcelDna/blob/master/Package/ExcelDna.AddIn/content/ExcelDna.Build.props#L35) instead of...

@govert Even if not many users actually rely on these features **directly**, the fact that it's forcing [some](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/exceldna/UidmRMaFIoU) [people](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/exceldna/GTUEglAbsPQ) to completely disable the build task will affect people that rely...

I was able to reproduce it just now on an Excel-DNA v1.1 add-in targeting .NET 4.8, using VS2019  Setting `Embed Interop Types` to `False` on the assemblies included by...