Sergey Rodionov

@raamb I think we should add beta label here.

The reason why registry is so expensive is the function "listServicesForTag", which returns list of services for the specific tag. This functionality is the reason why adding one tag to...

@ksridharbabuus I only said that this function will not be used from another contracts.

@ksridharbabuus Actually I haven't understood you comment.. If in DApp you use the cache service for tag search, so it means you don't need this function in the Registry for...

Just to make it clear... I haven't proposed to remove this functionality (listServicesForTag). I only stated that - it is very expensive in term of gas to maintain this functionality...

@ksridharbabuus I'm talking about calling this function from another contracts!!! 1. Calling view function from another contract costs gas 2. I want to repeat it again. We don't need simply...

What we proved for now is that one of argument in favor of this functionality (possibility of calling it from another smart contracts ) which we've discussed in HK was...

1. Unfortunately it is impossible to apply modifiers to the value without restriction to the content of value (maybe user indeed wanted to pass "b64encode@[email protected]" as a string). So modifiers...

About ```push``` command: The current version of snet-cli is written with assumption that we don't have the local version of "metadata". It is totally different ideology in which we don't...

It should be noted that it will partly solve issue with snet-cli being relatively slow #141 (if we properly generate stubs)