Thomas Robitaille
Thomas Robitaille
@taldcroft @mhvk - I've now implemented your comments/suggestions related to this PR, and it is now ready for a proper review
Ok sounds good, I'll try and work on this some more!
@taldcroft - comments implemented and rebased
@taldcroft - I realised that ``table`` can also be a list of strings or a file object. I have fixed the easy case where it is a list of lines,...
@taldcroft - I've skipped the limit limiting now for file objects. I ran into issues when trying to add a test for this because it seems that even something simple...
We should probably check that and raise a more explicit error though right? Is there no way we could support files opened with r?
This PR is helpful and needed, so will re-open and rebase!
I pushed a commit to address @mhvk's two small nitpicks
If I change the atol to 0.001 in ``test_deriv_1D`` the only model other than Lorentz1D that fails on the last stable release is ``KingProjectedAnalytic1D`` so that may be the next...
I think it might make sense to consider, at least for the additive case, a separate compound class that has a 'flat' structure, i.e. internally just has a list of...