Mikhail Astafev
Mikhail Astafev
> But I do think it would make sense for the DelegateParameter to inherit the validator of its source and also to complain if it gets passed a conflicting validator...
@alebrunoeth do you mind attaching a plot with that data and those outliers (as an image)? for a visual aid
@sohailc do you know if the work on this PR will continue?
@sohailc do you know if the work on this PR will continue? Or shall we close this PR?
@mgunyho would it be a decent workaround for you to pass a numpy array of ints to ArraySweep as opposed to list of ints? the challange is that whatever you...
> Why not just move it into the dockerfile ? don't know, honestly. I think because it then becomes "part of the container" so that for every new branch one'd...
@Dominik-Vogel - [ ] Rewriting the driver to explicitly set hardware limits then we can close #904
I have another separate question. so this feature enables 1) override existing parameters in instrument driver subclasses such that the original parameter won't need even be instantiated, and 2) produce...
> perhaps it will never be able to cover every possible case, though it would be nice to be able to use this approach and make sphinx work for all...
> Maybe the best example would be to rewrite the SGS100A microwave source driver using this new style. The reason is that this is the simplest driver, and it would...