Andrey Shchekin

@dominictarr > does it work as expected if you remove that? Yes, but the problem is I want `multipipe` for my scenario. I don't really remember the details of this...

Thanks for reporting -- can you try again and see if this is still happening? I was able to reproduce it, but for some reason it was only happening in...

Thanks for reporting! This one might be a bit tricky -- I'll take a look when I have a moment, but can't promise it will be soon.

Interesting, thanks for reporting! I would guess generators do need some extra setup that SharpLab does not have yet. I'll take a look when I have a moment.

Would require non-Cecil ILReader, postponed.

Unfortunately no progress yet. I am only working on SharpLab when I have motivation for it, so sometimes there is no progress for a while, or no progress in areas...

@Pzixel Thanks! I don't fully remember the details anymore, seems like we _could_ use Unbreakable validation there as @YairHalberstadt suggests. @YairHalberstadt Yet that makes sense. Btw the Blazor part would...

Thanks for reporting! What is the specific case that requires array to have more than 100 elements in SharpLab context? At the moment .NET Core uses a different Run architecture...

It's even a bit more complicated than this, since the new mode of Run in .NET 6 does not necessarily run in the same bitness as you have selected. I'll...

Thanks for reporting! Unfortunately F# compiler releases almost always include complex breaking changes in compiler APIs. Handling these changes requires detailed change documentation (which I wasn't able to find previously)...