Arnold Schrijver

Yes, I could, however: >Pull requests will be accepted only if the submitter is a current member of the W3C Social WG but issues can be opened by anyone. And...

Thanks. I made the changes (also reordered properties on `Object` definition to be alphabetically.

Wonderful to see this issue. I was pointed in this direction by @mariha in [this SocialHub topic](https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/proposal-new-top-level-forum-section-for-domains/1797). A whole ranch of new application types are considering a move to the...

Yes, fully agree. I just added ACM code of ethics to [awesome-humane-tech](https://github.com/engagingspaces/awesome-humane-tech) and as a PR to the README as URL in a new Related Work section (see: https://github.com/Widdershin/programmers-oath/pull/127 )

There is a really cool (but also disturbing) article today in The Guardian: [Franken-algorithms: the deadly consequences of unpredictable code ](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/29/coding-algorithms-frankenalgos-program-danger) that mentions this code of ethics. I recommend reading...

I have made a change for this in my fork, but I will PR once the other pending PR is merged (if you'll have it). Otherwise the PR's get mixed...

PR'ed: https://github.com/Widdershin/programmers-oath/pull/127

Thx for your response @mo-g and leaving the issue open :) > Short and sweet: the JSON licence. > > There were earlier and more complex alternatives, including no-nukes licences,...

Ha ha, don't worry @mo-g I won't, I won't :smile: Thx! Here is my edit on the humane tech forum: https://community.humanetech.com/t/idea-extending-oss-licenses-for-ethical-use-only/544/10 PS. One more relevant pointer to oaths and humane...

@bortzmeyer I agree. If stating 'ethical' it should not be in a single sentence, and it should probably also not be a 'full' definition of what constitutes ethical (this would...