Andreas Scherer

It seems this idea [existed a long time ago](https://github.com/ascherer/debbuild/blame/master/debbuild#L1635). I honestly don't know (i.e. doubt) that I'll find the time and energy to dig into this hornets nest any time...

Probably not. There is an older version of the `%debug_package` macro available. However, `debbuild` can't process it at this time, because `-f debugfiles.list` is not supported.

On closer inspection, I think I'll remove `%debug_package` from `macros.in`.

Will investigate. Thanks.

Maybe, but I've come to the same point as Kris Deugau in 2015: “I consider `debbuild` pretty much mature and complete—it does what I wrote it to do, and I'll...

I guess, debbuild works like git at this time. :o) Will investigate ASAP.

I can not confirm this issue. When I modify `debbuild.spec` (18.8.1) like this ``` diff --git a/debbuild.spec b/debbuild.spec index 343626d..b17a4d1 100644 --- a/debbuild.spec +++ b/debbuild.spec @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for...

Second try: ``` diff --git a/debbuild.spec b/debbuild.spec index 343626d..2f511ef 100644 --- a/debbuild.spec +++ b/debbuild.spec @@ -60,10 +60,11 @@ for i in debbuild Makefile; do %{__sed} "s/\@VERSION\@/%{version}/" -i $i; done #...

Just tested with debbuild 17.1.0. Case closed.

That's a completely different beast. For whatever reasons I decided in 16.1.3 to [ignore these lines](https://github.com/ascherer/debbuild/commit/a4bf47f795e3e5183972cdd4f5753de7984b59a1).