Alexander Saites
Alexander Saites
Superseded by #454.
Is this a duplicate of/would this be solved by #407?
I know this issue has been open awhile, and another user recently opened a similar issue. I posted this information on that thread, but think it's appropriate here as well....
Thank you for opening this issue. It's true that [we don't support][current-support] $\mathbf{FSIM}$, so this error message really should reflect that instead. That alone is not quite a bug in...
We definitely want to support the standard gates from the Quil spec, and we can include other well-known gates with consensus on a definition. Also, right now, it's a bit...
Thank you for opening this issue. Indeed, the purpose of [`to_unitary`][] is to "lift a `Gate` to the full `n_qubits`-qubit Hilbert space". The implementation appears to be [a port][port] of...
> The lifting operation is missing information - the order of the qubits in the Hilbert space. If I understand you and the code correctly, the current code intends to...
I marked this approved, but just noticed the CI checks failed due to an MSRV issue. Can you fix that up before merging?
As you've found, I don't believe there's a `FlatWavefrom` equivalent. That said, the `waveform` classes in `quil-rs` seem to have several differences in implementation relative `PyQuil`, with respect to how...
Thanks for reporting this. Indeed, [we don't currently have an implementation][current-gates] for the $\mathbf{XY}$, even though it is [a Standard Gate within the Quil Specification][quil-spec-standard-gates]. I wanted to confirm the...