Ajitem Sahasrabuddhe

> I don't think we should add any public API, we should just fix App.Name to always be the same thing. > I think command can be retrieved from the...

@meatballhat i see there’s a test failing. Will take a look at this later today.

> Improve testability of `*cli.Context`. A couple of potential options: > > * Create a `cli.NewTestContext` or similar that could give us the ability to configure private fields like `flagSet`...

Interesting Feature: Make the library modular. As mentioned in issue #1055 our library has grown quite large considering a plethora of features we are offering. While this is good, not...

When we were planning to release `v2`, there was some talk about how to go forward with the release. There were several chains of thought around the matter. I think...

I also think that we should start with a development branch for `v3` where we can merge the changes and keep it up-to-date with `master` until we decide to make...

@meatballhat im also open to have a zoom or google meets meeting for us to get together and plan the future of this library.

This PR doesn't intend to make the project modular. It simply exists to integrate the altsrc into the main package. To make the library modular is the last thing in...

I agree with you @rliebz. Apologies if I came too strongly there. What I wanted to say is I just wanted all the proposed changes together in the development branch...

I'd like us all to re consider this PR and we can then probably consider moving forward in the direction of a modular v3