Juanpe Bolívar
Juanpe Bolívar
Cool, thanks!
Hi @chuim, Thanks for investigating the issue! Regarding the GCC setup, if you use the `nix-shell` as advised in the project README it is super easy to get one without...
Yes, that is correct. Only operator `==` and `!=` are only comparisons for now that leverage structural sharing, but I would like to add forms of diffing. What is the...
Cool project! For now I would suggest to just implement it doing a `==` check before doing the actual ordering comparison. I leave the issue open and will try to...
@ruler501: to some degree that already exists for `flex_vector`, in the form of the concatenation operations. For `map` and `set` a union operation in such style could be implemented, but...
What algorithm are you thinking about? The problem I see with a mutating iterator is that it is only useful when you have something like this: ```cpp for (it =...
I just realized I did not pay enough attention to your second comment. In the first case, I was assuming the iterator returning a proxy reference (something like vector bool)...
Andrew Morris writes: > Cool :+1: > > I think I might be missing something when thinking about the case of > mutating most/all of the elements. Rather than preserving...
Hi Martin! Thanks for bringing this up. It is true that this is an important omission. It should be added. Some notes though: 1. `immer::flex_vector` and `immer::vector` iterators have an...
Martin Finke writes: > Thank you for the explanation! It helps me a lot. > > And great talk at CppCon! You mentioned that you work(ed?) in the > audio...