Arvid Norberg

Results 1037 comments of Arvid Norberg

It's not obvious to me that this additional wording is necessary. Isn't this implied?

> If it was implied then the reason for the discussion that took place in #87 wouldn't exist, no? I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that it's...

> But that is completely different (multi tracker vs multiple swarms) good point. > Implementations supporting both formats which joined both swarms of a hybrid torrent > MUST announce by...

the private flag cannot be set (currently) until the metadata is received. So when a magnet link is just started, it won't be private. It will look for peers via...

Ah, right. Of course.

@digidoggie18 your screenshot seems to demonstrate the rate limit *working*. Is there a chance you could average those rates over slightly larger time windows? by just squinting at that noisy...

> Plus, it has nothing to do with privacy.... It used to. in old versions of libtorrent, setting a proxy wouldn't necessarily use it, if it didn't support UDP for...

do the libtorrent-1.2.x and libtorrent-2.0.x tests use the same number of threads to hash with? (this is the `aio_threads` setting). If it's hard to tell, when looking at activity monitor,...

so maybe fewer `aio_threads` would be better in 2.0.x. it would probably increase "sequentiality"

@linax3-genuine can you describe the issues you experience when you set `hashing_threads` to 1?