Arvid Norberg
Arvid Norberg
> We also call simple_solution_generator(new_spend).program in the prevalidation, so maybe we should send that over to not have to recompute it. Yeah, I was considering that patch also. but after...
yeah, I agree my comments are a bit sparse
I see, so this is to prevent initiating an insertion into the mempool. makes sense. The line of reasoning I was going down was that this `seen_bundle_hashes` uses an unexpected...
> One of the "Closed" issues is actually quite active: > > #4936 That ticket is not active. Sure, people post comments on it, but none of it is driving...
this is addressed here: https://github.com/arvidn/libtorrent/pull/7356
that's really cool!
I would think that there are some privacy concerns with this protocol. For instance, it sounds like this would make it fairly easy to query a peer for all the...
It’s specified under the enforcement section. Is there anything in that section that need clarification?
yes, I agree. This should not be a MUST requirement. One way to achieve fewer announces in a backwards compatible way would be to also define a tracker response indicating...
come to think of it, if the same HTTP connection is used, it's not clear there is really that much value in saving a *request*. Most likely both requests would...