Adrian Roman
Adrian Roman
Hi, Thank you for the books, they were very helpful! I signalled an issue on the blog, but you might not visit it often, so I'll put it here, too....
There is a lot to be improved here. A good book on the subject is available for free online: https://pbr-book.org/
Currently importance sampling works only for simple objects (that is, not composite). For this project it's enough, it's just a proof of the concept and only simple ones are needed...
Would be nice to have one of them at least, but probably won't happen soon.
I think that could be made to work better, now it does it wrong for some models, in some parts.
The parser used in the reference client and listener does not parse correctly multi commands. The reason is that it should subtract from command length the bytes for command class...
For now I don't know why it's happening, but I'll try to explain what seems to be wrong. I have several devices, with a couple of them I can reproduce...
Hi, Related with the previous bug report, I was looking over this page: http://compphysics.github.io/ComputationalPhysics2/doc/pub/vmc/html/vmc-bs.html I noticed some issues in the python code. I think that the gradient optimization code for...
Hi, I was looking over your page here: http://compphysics.github.io/ComputationalPhysics2/doc/pub/vmc/html/vmc-bs.html and I noticed some possible issues. I did not compile and test the programs, though. This line: https://github.com/CompPhysics/ComputationalPhysics2/blob/a840b97b651085090f99bf6a11abab57100c2e85/doc/pub/vmc/programs/c%2B%2B/vmcsolver.cpp#L52 has a multiplication...
Maybe it's worth mentioning mine as well: https://github.com/aromanro/QCSim