arnavsinghvi11

@DanielUH2019 just following up on old PRs :), Could you resolve relevant conflicts and lmk when ready to merge?

Hi @excubo-jg , this specification is not a data limitation but rather to ensure compatible outputted dspy.Signatures to work with the DSPy library, which is written in English. You can...

Hi @excubo-jg , To work with a language of your choice, the InstructionOptimizer may need a bit of an internal refactor for the instruction optimizer specifically to ensure that all...

Thanks @GuyAglionby ! just following up on old PRs :)

Hi @GaneshSKulkarni , you can use `inspect_history` to get some more observability on the prompts and outputs being passed in. If you are looking for more in-depth tracing, feel free...

> > Hi @GaneshSKulkarni , you can use `inspect_history` to get some more observability on the prompts and outputs being passed in. If you are looking for more in-depth tracing,...

Thanks @jmanhype for the contribution! Could you resolve https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy/pull/682#pullrequestreview-1950064068? Also, it would be great if you add documentation for this under the [documentation folder as with the other LMs](https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy/tree/main/docs/api/language_model_clients). Thanks!

@jmanhype > Also run "ruff check . --fix-only" > add documentation for this under the [documentation folder as with the other LMs](https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy/tree/main/docs/api/language_model_clients). Thanks!

@jmanhype did you push? don't see new commits.

Hi @jmanhype still needs `ruff check . --fix-only` to be run. Also, to properly call `dspy.GPT4Vision`, you need to import it as the other LM modules: - [dsp module initialization](https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy/blob/e655d2233fcd70bbb3efea474086954b420f9b3a/dsp/modules/__init__.py#L11)...