Arnab Nandi

ping @anutosh491 for reviews.

Thanks for looking into this, I was thinking about commenting my thoughts about the reference comment here for some time now, so basically the referenced comment states that for something...

An easier reproduction of the problem can be as follows: ``` In [15]: repr Out[15]: sin(a⋅k) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ___________________________________________________ ╱ ____________________________________ ╱ ╱ 2 ╲╱ M₁ + M₂ - ╲╱ -M₁⋅M₂⋅(2...

wanted to know whether this issue is still active as i am interested in this issue..

I am not able to understand exactly what this issue is trying to resolve..I have realised that the python script talked about here generates man-pages for each binary in the...

I think the problem with the order term stems from the following: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/473d05c1a00a136be535c63f56dff7a05d9b47bd/sympy/functions/special/error_functions.py#L1796-L1799 I am not sure why it was increased in the first place but it seems that it...

I looked into it, and it seems that the line `n+=1` is not affecting the results in any way other than in order term though for the following line https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/24792d5f4fbf8fe4365101e53b735c6c1f140e0f/sympy/functions/special/error_functions.py#L1804...

What it seemed to me that sympy computes any rational expression such as `1/((x + 2*I)**(3/2))` very easily but when it comes to computing real and imaginary part of product...

> This approach risks infinite recursion so a different approach is likely needed instead. I have added some changes that will likely fix this issue. Can you please review the...

@oscarbenjamin I think for the two tests in question here, which were added to capture and highlight certain faulty behaviour in sympy to future contributors, like the `test_substitution_redundant()` was added...