Arfon Smith

@remram44 – This is the review thread for the paper. All of our communications will happen here from now on. Please read the "Reviewer instructions & questions" in the first...

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper

:wave: @alesarrett – you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html We already have...

> I would be willing to help with reviewing, but this is my paper, so it is > not so appropriate for me to review it! Of course! Unless I'm...

> I will look into the code next. @remram44 – just checking in to see how you're getting on completing your review?

@CJ-Wright @sbillinge – I'm struggling to find a second reviewer for this submission. Could you take a look at [this spreadsheet](http://bit.ly/joss-reviewers) and identify some possible candidates? Also, if there are...

Documenting some additional activity on my part here: I've just emailed @CJ-Wright & @sbillinge to ask them: 1. To respond to @remram44's [initial review feedback above](https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3119#issuecomment-8097815271) 2. To assist with...

@CJ-Wright & @sbillinge – it's close to 8 months since we've heard back from you about this submission. At this point I'm assuming you're no longer interested in pursuing this...

:wave: @dylanmcreynolds @untzag @HarinarayanKrishnan – you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html We...

:wave: @Nikoleta-v3 – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?