Mingzhe Huang

@timotheeguerin A quick question: does M4 sort the parameters? e.g. move the required parameters first, then optional parameters. Some SDKs like .Net will sort the parameters. Let's take a example...

Thanks @timotheeguerin ! It would be better to re-calculate the `$ref` if the given value is not found. That will make the customization much easier.

@timotheeguerin Do you want me close this issue, or keep it open as a feature request?

Hi @mvz, sorry for the late response. My original report is not correct. I doubled checked my daily test logs, and I think this problem should exist in `0.14.x` or...

Hi @anth1y have you tried the [work-around proposed](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby/issues/2795#issuecomment-669638570) in the original issue? That is actually a back-end service issue, as explained in [this comment](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby/issues/2795#issuecomment-708704004). Ruby SDK has [entered retirement phase](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#important-announcement),...

Hi @AkshayGoyal022 The Ruby SDK has entered the retirement phase, as announce [here](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#important-announcement). We would not make any substantial changes except for critical security fixes. Unfortunately Faraday has [break changes](https://github.com/lostisland/faraday/blob/main/UPGRADING.md)...

/azp run prepare-pipelines

> cadl files should not be commit to sdk repo. So is it a temporary solution, it will be removed in future? @chunyu3 I've deleted all those files. Thank.

> It looks like it was checked in as part of a [generator change](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/pull/32335) - I'm not sure why, I'm not familiar with that change: [`main`/sdk/containerregistry/Azure.Containers.ContainerRegistry/src/Blob/ArtifactManifest.Serialization.cs (commits)](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/commits/main/sdk/containerregistry/Azure.Containers.ContainerRegistry/src/Blob/ArtifactManifest.Serialization.cs) @annelo-msft That could...

> Hi @archerzz -- > > I tried deleting that file and regenerating the code, as shown in this PR - #33345. It looks like the generated serialization file is...