Andrey Prokopenko

> Let's reframe a bit the discussion because it got me confused. I think there are two related topics at hand here. The first one was more about splitting the...

I tried the same in #1191. I remember seeing some performance regression. You would need to run a lot of experiments to make sure there's none.

> Should I assume you tested with the performance fix on random access iterators [kokkos/kokkos#7304](https://github.com/kokkos/kokkos/pull/7304) ? Don't know. Regardless, we depend on Kokkos 4.5, and that patch appeared only in...

> Kokkos 5.0 is a couple weeks out. Are we still committed to only supporting the last 2 Kokkos minor releases or is that something you were wanting to change....

Trilinos 16.2 was released with Kokkos 4.7.1.

Theoretically, should be reproducible with the following steps: ```shell docker run --privileged -it registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest bash # Now inside the docker dnf -y install fedpkg git clone https://github.com/junghans/ArborX.spec dnf -y builddep...

> I can reproduce it natively using GitHub's arm runner with [junghans/ArborX.spec@`rawhide`/.github/workflows/continuous-integration-workflow.yml](https://github.com/junghans/ArborX.spec/blob/rawhide/.github/workflows/continuous-integration-workflow.yml?rgh-link-date=2025-04-20T00%3A31%3A44.000Z) How can I use it for debugging? I need something I can run locally to test. Or, at...

There's something extremely bizarre going on on Frontier with the Serial backend. After spending hours tracking things, I stumbled upon the following incomprehensible stuff: ```c++ Kokkos::parallel_for( "ArborX::MST::reset_shared_radii", Kokkos::RangePolicy(space, 0, n...

@junghans Does not seem like it works unless I'm missing something.

@junghans Is it possible to run the CI based on the current branch? So that if I push here, it runs the change and not 2.0. Also, is there a...