Andrey Prokopenko
Andrey Prokopenko
@alanw0 Great, thanks for the update.
> Did you only want to rename the file? This patch: - Renames the file - Gets rid of the unused batch kernel to run pseudo-inverse SVD on multiple matrices...
Rebased to resolve conflicts.
Rebased to resolve conflicts.
> Would you remind me whether we considered introducing a newer traits (not just a rename) and have the old access traits automatically translated to it if no specialization is...
> What are your thoughts about it? I expect that is implementable and may be nice to have but I lost track of all the changes and maybe that's just...
> Yes pretty much I can try to implement this. So, we would advertise new traits (`RangeTraits`?) but users won't have to rewrite the existing ones? Wonder how much benefit...
>> Wonder how much benefit there is, as we already broke backwards compatibility in the indexes constructors. > > That was my question I see little. I'd rather have users...
@dalg24 Thoughts on this PR?
> Please elaborate on the rational/motivation ### Move to `Experimental::` This is straightforward. We can't keep it in `Details` when it is part of the official interface and is a...