Pedro J. Aphalo

@danielinteractive Hi Daniel. I just watched "Statistical Software Engineering 101: Unit Testing for R Developers - The Basics". Very useful and clear! Although, the unit tests in my packages have...

@danielinteractive @cicdguy One problem that is keeping the "apparent" coverage low is that compute_panel and compute_group functions are defined separately and then assigned when the ggproto object is built. If...

@danielinteractive I thought about testing those functions on their own but then I would need to fake the arguments that the function will get as input and then test the...

@danielinteractive Now the overall coverage is about 75%. I am almost sure all tests are now seen by 'covr' so in some functions there is still code that is not...

@danielinteractive Now the overall coverage is about 88%. I was wrong, there was still code not seen. I also added tests for some internal functions as I promised to do...

Hi @yonicd Many thanks! I looked at your repo for 'covrpage'. 'covrpage' does look very useful. I have been using the 'devtools' based report table for coverage in RStudio to...

Hi @yonicd I am planning to follow as much as possible ROpenScience recomendations. One point they have added a couple of years ago is: "2.2.1 Travis CI (Linux and Mac...

@yonicd @danielinteractive In the case of 'vdiffr' tests, for the same reason that they are disabled on CRAN, it would be unwise an confussing to have them in a vignette....

@yonicd @danielinteractive I merged the pull request from @alexjoerich. The test coverage action that Danikar setup is no longer working, possibly because of the recent commits at https://github.com/insightsengineering/ [r.pkg.template](https://github.com/insightsengineering/r.pkg.template).

'ggpp' 0.5.2 is in CRAN @danielinteractive @maksymiuks @cicdguy @yonicd and all the rest of your people: thanks a lot for all your help in improving the package!!