aparajit-pratap

@Amoursol we can retest these workflows once the ASM team provides us with support for Surface.TrimWithEdgeLoops. Until then investing more time on these issues is not a good use of...

It could be an addin you have installed that has a dependency on a version of AvalonEdit that conflicts with the one used by Dynamo. Could you check any such...

@sm6srw any ideas on what could be different in the execution model of Player vs. Dynamo that could cause multiple executions in Dynamo but not in Player?

> @aparajit-pratap Looks like you simply replace the IList with object without any regressions (asides from mending a few tests) I guess I am now thinking why we needed the...

@brencass thanks for the reminder. The security issue has already been flagged by our internal security system and is being tracked for remediation in a future Dynamo release.

> To get geometry working devs will need to either pull asm 228.6 and use the -gp flag to point to it, throw it in the libG 228 folder, or...

> Drop support for asm 227, bring in polycurve enhancements to Dynamo. I think this drop will also contain the bounding box enhancements.

I suspect that .md file tests will need to be updated but we can look at those once the tests fail.

> > @mjkkirschner won't updating the CI scripts ensure that ASM 228.6 is pulled and dumped into the LibG 228 folder or do they rely on a host being installed...

> @aparajit-pratap @sm6srw @pinzart90 please take another look - I've reverted the min version of ASM to 228.5 - and done basic sanity tests with 228.6 and 228.5 asm, some...