Antoni Spaanderman

first i changed it in the wrong place, other things dependent on that data (the graph) broke, now i fixed in the right place, the startColor was set to the...

oh hmm i re-requested review and now @softsimon's review request got removed, still feel free to review though :)

> It won't be possible in a single transaction, every existing channel needs one transaction to close and they're completely independent of each other. Why? i for example have 2...

Will i be able to splice a channel and renegotiate some of the channel open parameters like commitment type, to self delay, etc? This would offer a way to upgrade...

> This is what dynamic commitments aims to do, you should be able to combine it with splicing. I have a branch here https://github.com/Crypt-iQ/bolts/tree/dyncom_no_pinning that describes a pinning-free version looks...

> This is what dynamic commitments aims to do, you should be able to combine it with splicing. I have a branch here https://github.com/Crypt-iQ/bolts/tree/dyncom_no_pinning that describes a pinning-free version actually...

> not sure what you mean here, the intermediate transaction is using a p2wsh in and a p2tr out. The splice or kickoff transaction that spends the p2wsh channel and...

i made a pull request on this pull request with script fixes https://github.com/Roasbeef/lightning-rfc/pull/1

> Maybe we should remove the NUMs point for the to_remote output, and just use the musig2 funding key there: in the best interest of the local party to just...

https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/995#issuecomment-1144469224 makes it invisible for outside observers to identify the to_remote output in case of a revoked commitment. if there are some htlcs on it that are long expired and...