Antoine

@andymass , thanks a lot. I just updated vim-matchup to your latest commit. Here is the before/after, unfortunately there is not much difference: # Before ``` 011.294 009.455: sourcing /home/antoine/dotfiles/.vim/plugins/vim-matchup/plugin/matchup.vim...

This takes roughly 3.5ms: ```vim lua require'treesitter-matchup'.init() ``` This takes 2.8ms: ```vim for l:mod in [ 'loader', 'matchparen' ] if !get(g:, 'matchup_'.l:mod.'_enabled', 1) continue endif call matchup#{l:mod}#init_module() endfor ```

@andymass , the second time, I used my regular config and opened my vimrc. The first time, I did not open any file and used the minimal vimrc. Here are...

@shunlir , thanks for this request. The "which line was selected" part is not doable. I tried it with previous implementations of **services** or **extensions**... The issue is that the...

2 Is not doable Is that ok ?

Sounds like a great idea, PR welcome !

I think this is more of a FZF than a coc-fzf issue, but I will assign it to you for now. Feel free to close this after investigation, or to...

@fragov , not yet, but I am open to Pull Requests. After quickly looking at ```coc-bookmark```, it seems that it would resemble the code we use for ```coc-yank```. If you...

From what i understand "keeping the preview buffer" currently only works with the "new_buffer_previewer". That wouldn't work with any other previewer. I will look into it and double check to...

If doable, clean and scalable, i agree that keeping the preview buffer would be the best way to go.