anonym

I don't care

(In fact I recommend a quick 2.3.1 that disables this -- me and another Tails contributor has already been affected by this, having had to resend multiple emails to confused...

> I am surprised to hear that the initial implementation of memory-hole drops either In-Reply-To: or References: header. Has anyone reported that as a problem upstream? When Memory Hole *is*...

Tails ticket: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/13649 Since this repo isn't used any more I propose we move the discussion there.