Ankur Verma

May I know why?

I'm not a big fan of cmake's scripting semantics but when it comes to supporting a Huge range of platforms and flavors, development environments, nothing comes even close. I'm curious...

Tagging some past relevant discussions #322 #495 #494 It seems the major point of contention was that there's no core-contributor familiar with cmake and willing to maintain it Is that...

> One last thing. I view this request as a "hey, my X is better. you should convert to X". This is a request to integrate any form of "build-system-generators"...

> No build system has come pre-installed with a version of Linux in some time. This is the norm. With an autotools based project automake is not needed by the...

I apologize for my misleading comments earlier Some of the programs I thought were binaries included with the autoconf tooling are indeed simply shell scripts as you described. So yes...

Thanks @mcuee for re-opening. Happy to re-engage if and when opinions on this change. Its great and pretty informative to read these perspectives on build systems in general too. The...

> support for shared/static libraries. If you want both It should indeed be fairly simple to incorporate SxS shared + static targets but I do not think that's a useful...

I've seen this pattern replicated in a few projects now. In general, I'm not really a big fan of "imperative-style" declarations in cmake that rely on changing variable values but...

I'm a complete novice when it comes to the USB internals but I'd be happy to setup the scaffolding around Creating C++ static/library that uses cppwinrt projections to interact with...