anishnaik

Hi @cruzdanilo thanks for submitting the issue and associated PR. We have an upcoming release in which we can include this fix with a few edits. Note that this upcoming...

Parity integration will also be removed since it is no longer supported and is now called openEthereum

Hi @rappie thanks for bringing this up, this will be a great feature addition. After thinking through it for a bit, the simplest option seems to be to use the...

@rappie so I've been working on a bug fix for this here: https://github.com/crytic/etheno/commit/6fb5725f50ce043f94cdbda11a91ab902d10bd4e#diff-5cd6b2cb236946ec22c8de58120240c893c21e015c0ab414a8b2f2feccdb3e0b The general idea here was to not call `eth_getTransactionReceipt` unless necessary. So, what I did was track...

This commit should fix the issue: https://github.com/crytic/etheno/commit/676ef39935f9f5367533d7e08251f5201958f70e The problem was that we converted transaction hashes into integers and then back to a hex string. This can lead to the truncation...

Yup, `.deployed()` works as well but the issue with that is we have to clearly specify that in the documentation and is a solvable edge case. Depending on what unit...

That's great to hear @rappie - thank you for your help in testing this out. The order will be different but I don't believe that that should cause any side...

Both create2 and create have this issue - Ganache is unable to discern that a transaction is internally going to create a contract as well.

Hi @jackson-clerkenwell-labs thanks for reporting this! We will be releasing a new version of etheno in the next few days that should fix this issue. In the meantime, using @elopez...

@jackson-clerkenwell-labs feel free to download the latest pre-release of etheno `pip install etheno==0.3a1` where this issue has been fixed. Feel free to use the latest version of ganache with it.