Andy Grove
Andy Grove
@alamb @liukun4515 I reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/3421, and it is not a new regression - there is no change from the behavior in 11.0.0, so I don't think that this is something...
Thanks for raising this @kmitchener. The docs for the Python bindings should absolutely be in the repo that contains the python bindings and not in the core datafusion crate. This...
Would it make sense to consider having a separate, optional, `datafusion-arrow2` crate containing a physical planner + operators that use arrow2? It seems to me that this would be easier...
Should we have a discussion/vote about whether this should be in `datafusion-contrib` rather than under Arrow governance? There are the options of creating a new repo such as `arrow-datafusion-arrow2` or...
@alamb @jorgecarleitao Do you have opinions on this?
> I do think there is broad agreement that the governance model of arrow2 (benign dictator) is not suitable for all users for a variety of reasons. I agree. Although...
> The main issue a few months ago was that the datafusion codebase was not split like it is now, so it created conflicts in the various places where it...
> I would be quite supportive of such a strategy and would be a nice way to let people use which every library they wanted Bonus points if it could...
I have filed an issue for adding GPU support: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1966 The proposed `arrow-gpu` crate differs from `arrow` and `arrow2` because it is necessary to transfer the array data to the...
I plan on fixing this for 14.0.0